Foodservice Footprint P23-286x300 Analysis: Mind the emissions gap - why now is the time to act Green Scene Green Scene Out of Home News Analysis  news-email

Analysis: Mind the emissions gap – why now is the time to act

The latest UN report shows that climate action is lagging well behind what’s needed. Countries must get serious, say experts at the World Resources Institute.

The UN’s annual Emissions Gap Report takes stock of where global greenhouse gas emissions are headed versus where they need to be if we are to avoid the worst effects of climate change. This is our “emissions gap”, and it is contributing to many of the escalating heat waves, droughts and extreme storms we’re seeing around the world.  Scientists and modellers have come together once again to measure the size of the emissions gap and explore what can be done about it. Here are five takeaways from this year’s report:

1. The emissions gap is larger than previously estimated. To estimate the emissions gap, scientists first collect the latest information on countries’ climate commitments (known as nationally determined contributions or NDCs) and their projected emissions pathway. They then compare this pathway with the latest models on limiting warming to 1.5°C-2°C, the Paris Agreement’s temperature goals and the limit scientists say is necessary for preventing some of the worst climate impacts.

The emissions gap is large. While the NDCs will limit total global emissions to 53-56 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (GtCO2e) by 2030, keeping warming below 2˚C requires reducing them to 40 GtCO2e on average. And to limit warming to 1.5˚C, we’d need to reduce them to 24 GtCO2e.

Notably, the emissions gap has grown compared to past reports. This is in part because the new report groups pathways under three temperature scenarios (below 2˚C, below 1.8˚C and below 1.5˚C), resulting in different 2030 emissions ranges from the 2017 report. Also, the emissions gap is estimated to be larger than the previous report because there is more literature on emissions pathways consistent with the 1.5˚C and 2˚C goals. Some of the latest literature has been more cautious in relying upon large-scale carbon removal, and accordingly, greater emissions cuts are required to compensate.

2. Emissions will not peak by 2030 even if countries fully implement their climate commitments. While global emissions from fossil fuels and industrial sources flatlined from 2014 to 2016, they increased again in 2017, reaching a record high of 54 GtCO2e. The latest science suggests it is critical that emissions peak by 2020 if we are to have a good chance of limiting warming to 1.5-2˚C. However, the report finds that even if countries honour their NDCs, emissions will continue to grow not only through 2020 but through 2030.
For the first time the report documents trends in individual countries’ emissions peaks based on World Resources Institute (WRI) research. While there is an encouraging trend – emissions peaked in 19 countries in 1990, growing to 49 by 2010 and 57 by 2030 – it’s not enough to cause a global emissions peak in the next few years.

3. Unless countries strengthen their 2030 climate commitments, we can’t limit warming to 1.5˚C, and it’s extremely unlikely we will limit warming below 2˚C. The report finds that if countries don’t strengthen their ambition and cut 2030 emissions beyond what the current NDCs require, exceeding 1.5˚C “can no longer be avoided”. And unless the emissions gap is closed by 2030, it is unlikely we will limit warming below 2˚C.
To achieve the 1.5˚C target, emissions need to be slashed by more than half from today’s levels (from 54 GtCO2e in 2017 to 24 GtCO2e in 2030), or by 25% for 2˚C (to 40 GtCO2e in 2030).

4. Collectively, G20 countries are not yet on track to meet their climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. The report also zooms in on G20 member countries, most of which have pledged emissions-reduction targets for both 2020 and post-2020. These countries account for around three-quarters of global emissions, so their emissions trajectories drive global trends. Several G20 members are also members of the EU (which makes a single emissions-reduction commitment), while three G20 members did not make pledges for 2020, so the report looks at a total of 13 pledges for 2020 and 16 post-2020 ones.

Seven countries are on track to achieve their 2020 pledges (Australia, Brazil, China, the EU, India, Japan and Russia), two are not (Canada and South Korea), and the remainder are subject to uncertainty (Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa and the US). However, because some countries are expected to over-deliver on their emissions-reduction pledges, collectively the G20 is on track to achieve its 2020 commitments.

For post-2020 pledges, the report finds that six countries are on track (Brazil, China, India, Japan, Russia and Turkey), eight are not (Argentina, Australia, Canada, the EU, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, South Africa and the US), and two are uncertain (Indonesia and Mexico). G20 members would need to reduce emissions by an additional 2.5 GtCO2e by 2030 to achieve their collective target. (This takes into account only those pledges that are not conditional on financial support or other international actions.)

5. Countries must step up implementation and strengthen their NDCs.
Countries must increase their ambition immediately to close the emissions gap. The report outlines a few ways they can do this. For one, they can strengthen or add emissions-reduction targets, as well as sectoral targets such as those related to renewable energy. They can commit to implementing their NDCs in line with achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. The report also notes the potential to make existing policies more stringent (for example, those related to renewable energy and industrial energy efficiency), and to explore promising policies that haven’t yet been widely adopted (for example, carbon pricing and reducing fossil fuel subsidies).

The report also highlights the important role of non-state action. For example, international co-operative initiatives have occurred in a variety of sectors including energy, transport, agriculture and industry. Almost a quarter of initiatives cover agriculture. The report finds that those actions focused on resilience and agriculture are largely being implemented in low-income and middle-income economies.

Closing the Emissions Gap
Calls for enhanced climate action are getting louder and louder with every release of the gap report. The 2018 report – which comes hot on the heels of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 1.5°C report and the US National Climate Assessment – should be received with even greater urgency. Importantly, studies find that moving to an emissions trajectory consistent with achieving the Paris Agreement’s temperature goals can enhance food security, access to clean water and reduce air pollution, among other benefits.

The UN climate conference currently taking place in Poland offers the most immediate opportunity for countries to step up their ambition and strengthen their NDCs. With a narrowing window to peak emissions and a growing emissions gap, now is the time to put scientific findings into action.

Kelly Levin is a senior associate with the WRI’s global climate programme, Taryn Fransen is a senior fellow at the WRI and Mengpin Ge is an associate with the WRI’s Global Climate Programme. This article is an edited version of one originally published in November by the WRI.